About Me

Name: Professor Eisenstein
Email: mmeisenstein@sbcglobal.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

The Biggest Losers during the Democratic Convention are the American People

Why are the American people being denied their cherished beliefs in the democratic process in Denver?
The TV talking heads are discussing whose feeling were challenged and whose was stroked during the current Democratic Convention, especially whether is was Senator Barak Obama (with the Daley and Kennedy family) or the Clinton family. The main point seems to have been lost on everyone which is the existence of a set of rules and laws in this democracy that needs to be reinforced by the political party. These rules and laws are intended to make the process democratic.  This is the very belief and goal of the Democratic Party since the 1968 convention in Chicago.  If the political parties do not do it, then the whole political system will suffer from a lack of legitimacy in the eyes of the American public.
Through the 2008 primary season, the players followed the rules established by the American Constitution, states’ constitutions and election laws, and finally the Democratic Party’s (and the Republican Party's) own rules and regulations governing the primary selection of a nominee for president of the United States. The players included not only the candidates but also the Democratic primary voters and the American people who will be voting in the general election in November.
At the end of the Democratic Party’s primary season there was NO winner. Both remaining candidates did not legally receive enough delegate votes to be crowned the nominee. (This actually did happen in the Republican Primary – legitimately). Senator Barak Obama and Senator Hillary Clinton were in a tie, a dead-heat.  Ok, there is no problem so far, this is what the convention was democratically created to solve and resolve.
But then the Chicago mafia with the help of the Kennedy clan strong armed, fascistically, Senator Clinton to not abide by the rules and concede and drop-out.  Concede what?  She was in a dead heat with Obama.  Why him?  Who got the most votes is irrelevant. Where is that in the rules?   By the way so is who won the biggest states or the most states irrelevant. The only item that democratically mattered was the elected delegates. In that category, it was a tie, a dead-heat, and there was no clear winner. It had to go to the convention to be legitimitly determined.
Instead what won the day was threats, buy-outs, and family loyalty – true undemocratic tribalism.
Once the rules were “suspended” and manipulated by allowing the Michigan and Florida delegation to participate, the actual legal winner would have been Hillary Clinton. But the Obama thugs through sheer power of money would not allow that.
The main reason that Obama and his handlers could not let the democratic decision go the Democratic delegates is that they knew he would loose.  Look at where the national polls are today months after Clinton ran out of money and half way through the anointing coronation of Obama.  In a truly democratic process, in a democratic political party, Hillary Clinton would be the nominee.
This is what the Chicago and the Kennedy mafia set out to stop and now they have.
Even during the roll-call votes of the states, it was becoming embarrassing when through every effort and threat directed at the Clinton delegates to go with the anointed one; Hillary Clinton was still getting over 25% of the votes. This included many delegations that broke or intended to break their states’ binding vote laws and the by-laws of the Democratic Party by changing from Clinton to Obama.
The democratic process was stolen from the American people by Barak Obama’s fascist handlers.  They won and have taken over the Democratic Party (at least until November).  Look at the spectacle tonight (Thursday) and tell me it does not remind you of the 1930s.
The American public should demand a respect for democracy and the rule of law by the Democratic Party.  These Chicago political rules must stop, even if only at the Chicago City limits.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Senator Hair Plugs for VP

As the Secret Service heads for Senator Joe Biden's estate, we finally know the VP man.  What do we know?  He is vain enough to require hair plugs as a U. S. Senator.  Now here is a person seriously interested in things of value beyond being a celebrity.  How is he different from  the Paris Hiltons?  Well actually now that I think about it, that does fit in with the empty suite celebrity that Obama is passing for a real candidate.

Senator Biden is now sitting in his Deleware "estate" as it is described by all the media, past and present.  How ironic after Obama spend millions of dollars on advertising attacking McCain for owning some houses (actually his wife).  This is exactly what we need for VP another limousine liberal.  For the limousine liberal, libralism applies to the forgotten American while the limousine belongs to him.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Springfield Highlights What is Wrong with Obama

Ironically, Saturday's announcement in Springfield, Illinois by Obama of his vice-presidential selection underscores the problems he has connecting with the American people as a legitimate and independent presidential candidate. Obama's campaign probably chose Springfield because of its connection with the beginnings of the greatest American President Abraham Lincoln, with the meteoric rise of Senator Obama in American politics, and finally with the beginning of this “dream” race to the White House of “Mr. Outside.”

The announcement in Springfield will show just the opposite.  It will show glaringly what is wrong with Obama and his Illinois connections.

President Abraham Lincoln was a Republican and his greatest detractors and defeatists during the Civil War were the Democrats and the Democratic Party. Lincoln was the first abolitionist President and the first and only civil war President -- experience and maturity was the tantamount characteristic required and both are lacking in Senator Obama. Today, the Republican President may have low popularity; but the popularity of the Democratic Congress is even lower – actually it has never been lower.
Springfield will remind the American Nation that what is needed in the White House in these crucial times is a wrinkled, weather-beaten, seasoned veteran whose moral fortitude has been tested real life or death situations; not a neophyte GQ media creation who finds himself in adult pants.
Springfield, the State Capital of Illinois, is also the capital of the most corrupt political system in the Country (with the exception of Lake County, Indiana). This political system created and nurtured Barak Obama to the position he is in today. Why?  This will be payback time for all the corrupt political officials who Obama owes big time. Just this week, Obama’s mentor and maker in the Illinois Senate, Emile Jones, announced his retirement at age 72 and the automatic passing of his Senate Seat to his son Emile Jones III – yes, passing on as in an inheritance.
This is not new in Illinois.   Todd Stroger’s son inherited the Presidency of the Cook County Board. It is universally accepted that the sons (and daughters) and families are incompetent but tribal family trumps all. (Let us not forget the Daley family; but more on that later.)   In Illinois, this does not make a difference because one is “entitled” to governmental privileges and perks. This is how Illinois tribal politics works and Springfield will remind the nation that Senator Obama is part of the tribal political system. 
Springfield will remind the Nation that Barak Obama remains the child of the political system that has had its last four out of five chief executives (i.e. governors) indicted for corruption and now in jail.  Springfield will remind the Nation of Obama’s ongoing corruption and corruptibility. In Illinois, this is called “entitlement.”  Never once in all of his time in Illinois politics did Obama make one stand against corruption or in favor of the people he represented.
There is Mayor Daley, Axelrod, Daly's chief spokesman, is now the manager and creator of the Obama campaign, and Abner Mikva who made Obama in local politics.  We also have the close personal friends of Daley and the Illinois Governor Rezko and Bill Ayres, the wealthy terrorist, who made Obama financially.  Anyone really think this is an accident?  Possibly a sign of Obama's unique talents? 
Springfield will remind the Nation that Rezko and Obama are and were in the middle of this corruption.  The Nation needs to be reminded that one of the achievement for Obama will be to pardon Rezko. That is why Rezko has not turned State’s evidence against Obama.
What else will Springfield bring home to the American people about Barak Obama?  The families behind the throne will be front and center. These two families are the Daley’s and the Kennedy’s. The Daley’s will be repeating the favor they did for father Joe Kennedy in the 1960 election. No one doubts the John Kennedy could not have won without the “late” arrival of Mayor Daley’s Chicago votes in Springfield.  Now we are repeating the same situation.
Springfield represents the return of the Democratic family politics of the Kennedy/Daley machine.   In the Daley camp, you have the Mayor with his brother Bill.  In the Kennedy camp, you having an ill, but not dead, Senator Ted Kennedy in addition to all the family of young interconnected Kennedy’s. Why did the young rapist Kennedy doctor come to Chicago?  He is protected.  Anyone ever wonder where Carolyn Kennedy all of a sudden came from to support Obama and then she is selected to vet the VP?   Why?  What is the connection?  She says "he" reminds her of her father -- give me a break.
What Springfield will remind the Nation is that the Kennedy/Daley machine is the puppeteers creating and leading Obama. They wanted to ensure that Clintons would not win again.  The Kennedy/Daley machine knew that if Hillary Clinton had won the nomination their days as a family dynasty was over.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Clinton Supporters Realize that Obama is a Genuine Fraud

The following is a complaint from the pro-Hillary Clinton contingent of the Democratic Party.  They are not only complaining, (accurately I would argue), that Barry Obama continues his theft of the nomination by limiting convention voting access of the duly elected delgates for Clinton.  Obama is pushing to not even have Clinton nominated at all.  This is unheard of in modern democratic party politics in the United States, Republican or Democrat.  Reagan was nominated against Ford and Kennedy was nominated against Carter; both Ford and Carter were sitting U. S. Presidents at the time.  But, in all fairness it is true they were not the annoited one or the .messiah

It leads one to believe the Barry Hussain Obama is in reality a Trotsky follower.  (Together with Chicago's Reverend Jeremiah Wright and Father Flagerty being his close comrades, according to Barry, this should not come as a surprise.)  Barak Hussain Obama is willing to destroy any pretense of American democratic values to achieve what he perceives is owed to him and as the annoited one should be handed to him.  (By the way, that is why any criticism of the messiah is interpreted as "racism".  The true hiding place of a scoundral.)

In addition the Clinton people bring out the following lack of basic information on Barry that would be provided by any candidate running for public office, unless they obviously have something to hide.


"Team Obama has not yet released the following fairly routine requests for documents*:
    1. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate
    2. Columbia College records
    3. Columbia Thesis paper
    4. Certification of Live Birth showing where born
    5. Harvard College records
    6. Illinois State Senate records
    7. Illinois State Senate schedule
    8. Law practice client list and billing records/summary
    9. Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers
    10. Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
    11. Occidental College records
    12. Parent's Marriage Certificate
    13. Record of baptism
    14. Selective Service Registration
    15. Trips schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
    16. Scholarly articles
    17. Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups"

*8/11/2008 email quote sent by the Hillary for President supporters.

Now if the Democratic supporters of Hillary Clinton think the Barry Obama is such a fraud, why would anyone doubt the fact that he is a fraud.  Is there anything in his background that denies or validates anything about his existence or his so called "experiences".  Sadly Senator John McCain even has the North Vietnamese to validate his honor as an American hero and he has 20 + years of public service in the United States Senate.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary Clinton Has Been Right All Along About Barry Obama

The latest Rasmussen Daily Tracking Poll (Aug 8) of 3,000 likely voters shows McCain with a national lead of 1% over Obama in the race for President.  (This has not sifnificantly changed for months).  This is after Senator Barak Obama getting every possible campaign advantage known to man or women.  This is after Senator Clinton suspended her campaign and after Obama world-wide presidential campaign tour. 

It is clear that the people voting for McCain are solid; while the Obama voters are at best "iffy".  "Iffy" not only because they may change their mind; but in reality Democratic and Democratic leaning independent voters do not tell pollsters that they do not plan to vote for Obama when they in fact actually have no intention of voting for him.

This is not the traditional consequence of race being a factor in the election, i.e. racism.  It is in fact reverse racism.  These voters would love to vote for an African-American, Hispanic, or a women.  It is Obama policies and history they cannot stand.

This is in polling reverse discrimination.  These voters either do not like Obama's policies, his lack of experience (one speech in 2002), or his sexist attacks on Senator Hlllary Clinton.  Nonetheless, they will not say they are not voting for Obama because they fear (true an irrational one), that they will be viewed or labeled as racists.

This reverse discrimination actually significantly underestimates McCain's strength in all the polls.  If the an acutal hones poll could be taken of the population, I would argue that at this point McCain is leading by over 10% points over Obama.  That is why Obama cannot make any progress; no matter how well he is covered and treated by the press.

As Senator Clinton has always argued Obama is unelectable.  He is unelectable because he represents the opinions, perceptions, and hopes of only a relatively small minority of Americans, 20% at the top end.  Nothing Obama or the Democrats can do will change that.  Their only option is to bring back Senator Clinton as their nominee. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »