About Me

Name: Professor Eisenstein
Email: mmeisenstein@sbcglobal.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Notre Dame Sells Its Relgious Soul

Today, the American Catholic Church has sold its theological soul on the platform of popular opinion and Hollywood popularity. Today, the best know American anti-life politician, President Barak Obama, will be the honored guest and speaker at the commencement ceremony of Catholicism’s most revered and renowned school of higher education in the United States, the University of Notre Dame. To put this in perspective, Notre Dame has by far greater influence on American public opinion and therefore the lay Catholic thought than the Washington D.C. based Catholic University of America. It is true a large part of that did not come from theology. Knut Rockne was at Notre Dame (Ronald Reagan was not; but the “Gipper” was.)
This is not a question of free speech or academic freedom. There is no state agency or law preventing President Obama from speaking. In addition, I am willing to bet that over 90% of the faculty at Notre Dame is anti-life, which is consistent with national academic figures. Consequently, Notre Dame’s students have been exposed, ironically, primarily to predominantly, if not solely, the anti-life, i.e. anti-Catholic, position.
At a time, this week to be exact, when the American national polls are showing for the first time that more of America’s citizens are pro-life than anti-life, this godless university decides to legitimize the position of proclaiming an abortion free for all by honoring its number one proponent in the world, Obama.
It is not just that President Obama is for abortion. He is the most anti-life politician on the planet. He has voted and argued for abortion positions that most American politicians have rejected as far too extreme. On this issue, he is even more radical than Mrs. Clinton and Planned Parenthood. In fact, Obama’s position is definitely more radical than current abortion law is in any European country.
In this Country, all that may very well be the Obama’s right to believe. There is no law against being wrong and/or immoral. But, there is no requirement that a Catholic university honors such a person and legitimizes this radical position. What the University of Notre Dame is legitimizing is that this is one alternative acceptable position among others. And further, we do not have a problem with people who hold this anti-Catholic theological position.
Irrespective of what comes out of Obama’s teleprompter today, Notre Dame has done irreversible damage to American Catholicism’s legitimacy when it argues for its cogent theology. The Pope, by not criticizing the University, has placed politics above belief. Although in this world that is understandable; it will not win any believers.
The fact is that one cannot be anti-life and still claim to be a Catholic. All that one is claiming when they say this is that I was baptized a Catholic and that is it. This might be true but meaningless as far as religion and God is concerned from a Catholic perspective.
Frankly, I am not Catholic. Yet, I am furious at the Catholic Church for speaking and acting out of two sides of its mouth. One is theological pro-life, which it tends to feed a lot and stand on in Africa and other “third” world countries. The other is political correctness to the point of making its beliefs vacuous. In the process it is not just remaining neutral, it is doing severe damage to the pro-life believers and is defending the killing of created souls. (By the way, I do realize that there is also a controversy about stem cell research but that is morally so far removed when you are confirming the legitimacy of an individual who supports the literal killing of “mistaken” aborted fetuses.)
With this speech, the University of Notre Dame and the Catholic Church forever end their place as the pontificators of the moral high ground. It is ironic, just as people were beginning to listen, the academic have succeeded to undermine the most powerful church in the world.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Administration Tries to Prove a Negative

The United States currently remains one of the few countries around the world to have not taken any serious action on its borders against the Mexican Flu, nor limited movement between itself and Mexico.   As I have detailed earlier, even countries and entities not usually friendly to the United States, such as China, Cuba, and the EU have banned or modified travel and movement to and from Mexico.  On these countries' part this was not an anti-Mexican move, only a legitimate response to secure the safety of their citizens from a killer flu that originated in Mexico.
Thank G-d, that in the United States we have "only" had the death of a young American citizen, age 30, whose only "medical condition" was having a baby.
The Obama administration is claiming that there was not a reason to close the border because nothing really bad happened.  That is to say, the idea of a pandemic was over-blown and utilized solely as a scare tactic.  An even more outlandish claim was that the requirement to close the border with Mexico, or ban movement between the U.S. and Mexico, was driven by bigotry and anti-Mexican sentiment.
This shows the ignorance and anti-Constitutionalism of the Obama administration.  The American governments main and primary value, i.e. raison d'etre, is the security and health of the CITIZENS of the United States.
There is absolutely no way to know what would have happened with this flu if the States and local governments had not take  things into their own hands.  Across the country, schools were closed and events canceled or significantly modified.  Frankly, most American citizens took the advise of the Vice President and stayed away from crowded public places.   Ironically, the one time VP Biden spoke accurately and President Obama gets upset.
Since all these measures were taken by American citizens and by other countries with responsible governments, the Obama administration can only claim a lack of guts and courage to act.  As of now, they have only gotten lucky not responsive.  The Obama administration has shown its callousness and disregard for the public safety.  (And by they way, how far they are willing to go not to offend a voting group.) 
One cannot say: "see the world and the States did all those things as a response to the Mexican flu; but, they were unnecessary because there were not a lot of deaths."  We do not know if the mildness of the American experience was due to a great degree because citizens and the States acted responsibly.  If the American States and other countries, such as China and Cuba,  would have acted like Obama than no one knows the consequences would have been from the Mexican flu.
What we do know is that the World Health Organization (WHO) is now projecting that close to 2 billion people around the world will come down with the Mexican flu.  The WHO is also fearful of what will occur when the second round of flu in the southern hemisphere attacks in the next two months, when it will be winter there.  It is also concerned about the third round, which will be in North America next winter.
Finally, neither the WHO, the CDC, nor any other government or scientist know as of yet why the strain of Mexican flu has been so deadly to the healthy.  Even in the United States, the individuals who predominantly fell ill were the young and healthy.
It is quite likely that what helped ease the effect of the Mexican flu in the United States was a federal form of government that allowed the States to act even when the Federal government was paralyzed.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »